Business Owners / Planning Note 06

Key Person Insurance for Canadian Businesses

Some companies have a person they can’t afford to lose, and don’t know what losing them would actually cost. This is how you find out.

13 min read · Updated August 2026

Key person insurance is a policy a business owns on someone it can’t afford to lose. If that person dies, the death benefit gives the company cash and time: to keep operating, replace them, reassure lenders and clients, and absorb the revenue gap while it recovers. The first question is whether the loss would create a material financial exposure. If it does, the next questions are how large that exposure is and whether insurance is an appropriate way to fund it.

In short
  • A key person is anyone whose loss would materially damage the business, owner or not. The test is dependency, not title.
  • Most pages tell you key-person insurance exists. Fewer tell you how to size it. There are four methods, and running only one usually understates the exposure.
  • Premiums are generally not deductible, and the death benefit is generally received tax-free by the corporation and can feed the capital dividend account.
  • The business owns the policy and controls it, which means coverage should be reviewed as roles change, not set once and left.

What a key person actually is

The label sounds like it means an executive. It doesn’t. A key person is anyone whose sudden loss would leave a hole the business can’t quickly fill, and the most dangerous ones are often invisible on the org chart. The salesperson who personally holds the top twenty client relationships. The technical lead the product depends on. The founder who is, quietly, the reason half the revenue exists.

The test is simple to state and uncomfortable to answer. If this person didn’t come in tomorrow and never returned, what breaks? If the answer is revenue, or client confidence, or the ability to service debt, or months of expensive scrambling to replace them, the business has a key-person exposure whether or not it has ever named it. Naming it is the first useful thing key-person planning does.

The question no one answers well: how much?

The large insurers will tell you the coverage exists. Far fewer will help you size it.

This is where most key-person content stops and where the actual work begins. Search the subject and you’ll find page after page explaining what key-person insurance is, followed by a form to get a quote. Almost none of them help with the only question that determines whether the coverage is useful: what is the loss actually worth?

There isn’t one formula, because the loss has more than one dimension. There are four defensible ways to measure it, and a serious answer usually runs more than one and reconciles them.

1
Replacement costWhat it would take to find, hire, and bring a replacement up to speed: recruiting, compensation premium, and the productivity lost during the ramp. Straightforward to estimate, and usually the floor rather than the full picture.
2
Revenue or profit contributionThe revenue or profit genuinely attributable to this person, multiplied by the time it would take the business to recover. This captures the client relationships and the earning power a replacement can’t immediately reproduce.
3
Debt and guaranteesThe corporate debt, personal guarantees, and lender obligations that depend on this person’s continued involvement. Lenders often watch a key departure closely, and some facilities are effectively tied to the person.
4
Business-value impairmentThe estimated drop in the enterprise’s value if this person is gone. The hardest to quantify and often the largest, because a business built around one person is worth materially less without them.

No single number is right. Replacement cost alone understates a rainmaker; revenue contribution alone ignores the debt that could be called. The point of running several is to see the exposure from more than one angle and choose coverage that holds up against all of them. That is what a proper needs analysis produces, and it’s the difference between insuring a person and guessing at a figure.

How the tax works

When the business owns the policy and is the beneficiary, which is the standard structure, the premiums are generally not deductible. The Canada Revenue Agency treats them as a capital outlay, not a cost of earning income. Owners sometimes expect a write-off because the coverage is for a business purpose; there generally isn’t one, outside the narrow case of a policy collaterally assigned for a business loan.

The trade-off runs the other way, and favourably. The death benefit is generally received by the corporation tax-free. And because a private corporation receives it, the amount above the policy’s adjusted cost basis is credited to the capital dividend account, which can later move to shareholders as a tax-free capital dividend. So the same policy that protects the business against the loss can also, after the fact, become a tax-efficient way to move value to the owners. This is one of the places key-person coverage connects to corporate-owned insurance planning more broadly.

Term or permanent, and what happens when roles change

The coverage should match the shape of the risk. A key-person exposure with a natural end, a transition period, a loan term, a person expected to become less central over time, points toward term insurance. An exposure that doesn’t expire, often where the key person is also an owner and the same policy supports estate liquidity or a buy-sell, points toward permanent coverage, which costs more and builds cash value.

Because the business owns the policy, it controls what happens as circumstances change. When a key person’s role shrinks, or they leave, the company decides whether to keep, cancel, or transfer the coverage, though a transfer between the corporation and an individual can trigger tax and should be reviewed first. The habit worth keeping is a periodic review, so the company isn’t paying for coverage on someone who has become peripheral, or missing coverage on someone who has quietly become essential.

When key-person insurance is warranted, and when it isn’t

When it fits

The business genuinely depends on one or a few people, such that their loss would cut revenue, threaten debt, or take months and real money to recover from. Most owner-managed companies have at least one such person, frequently the owner.

When it doesn’t

The business is broad and resilient, with no single person whose loss would materially move revenue or unsettle lenders. Or the exposure is real but better addressed another way, for instance by reducing the dependency itself through cross-training and documented relationships. Insurance funds the loss; it doesn’t reduce the underlying concentration, and sometimes reducing it is the better first move.

Common questions

Who is considered a key person?

Anyone whose loss would materially damage the business: a founder, an executive, a lead salesperson who holds the client relationships, a technical specialist the product depends on. The test isn’t title, it’s dependency. If this person didn’t come in tomorrow and never returned, would revenue fall, would lenders worry, would clients leave, would it take months and real money to replace them? If yes, they are a key person, whether or not they own shares. Many key people are not owners, and their departure is invisible on the ownership documents until it happens.

How much key person insurance does a business need?

Enough to cover the financial hole the loss would create, which there are four ways to estimate: the cost to replace the person, the revenue or profit attributable to them over a recovery period, the debt and guarantees that depend on them, and the impairment to the business’s value. No single formula is universally right. The sensible approach is to run more than one and reconcile them, because a number built from a single method usually misses part of the exposure. This is exactly what a proper needs analysis does, rather than defaulting to a round figure.

Can the owner be the key person?

Often the owner is the key person, especially in a smaller company where the founder holds the relationships, the expertise, and the direction all at once. In that case key-person insurance and other coverage the owner needs (buy-sell funding, estate liquidity) can overlap, which is why they should be planned together rather than bought separately. Owning several policies for several purposes on the same life is common; stacking several purposes onto one policy is where structures tend to go wrong.

Is key person insurance tax deductible in Canada?

Generally no. When the business owns the policy and is the beneficiary, the Canada Revenue Agency treats the premiums as a capital outlay rather than a cost of earning income, so they are not deductible. A limited deduction may be available in certain lender-required collateral-assignment situations where the statutory conditions in paragraph 20(1)(e.2) are met, including assignment to a restricted financial institution for a qualifying borrowing, and even then the deductible amount can be limited. The trade-off for non-deductibility is favourable: the death benefit is generally received by the corporation tax-free, and can feed the capital dividend account.

Who receives the death benefit?

The business, when it owns the policy and is named beneficiary, which is the standard structure for key-person coverage. The company receives the proceeds and uses them to absorb the loss: to keep operating, recruit and train a replacement, reassure lenders and clients, and cover the revenue gap during the transition. Because a private corporation receives the benefit tax-free, the amount above the policy’s adjusted cost basis is credited to the capital dividend account, which can later be paid to shareholders tax-free. Naming an individual instead of the company would forfeit that treatment and can create a taxable benefit.

What happens when the key employee leaves?

The company owns the policy, so it decides what happens to it. It can keep the policy if there’s a continuing reason, cancel it, or in some cases transfer it, though a transfer between the corporation and an individual can trigger tax and should be reviewed before it’s done. Because coverage is tied to the person’s importance to the business, the sensible practice is to review key-person policies when roles change, so the company isn’t paying for coverage it no longer needs or missing coverage on someone who has become critical.

Should key person coverage be term or permanent?

It depends on how long the exposure lasts. Term insurance suits a defined-duration need: a key person the business expects to become less critical over time, or coverage tied to a loan or a transition period. Permanent insurance suits a need that doesn’t expire, often where the key person is also an owner and the policy serves estate liquidity or buy-sell funding as well. Permanent coverage costs more and builds cash value; term costs less and covers a window. The choice follows the shape of the risk, not a preference.

Does key person insurance cover disability, not just death?

Life insurance covers death. A key person who becomes disabled or seriously ill creates the same operational problem without triggering a life insurance payout, which is why key-person disability and critical illness coverage exist as separate products. A complete key-person plan considers all three, because the business depends on the person being able to work, not merely being alive. Which risks to cover, and how much, is part of the needs analysis rather than a single default policy.

Sources & technical references
  1. Canada Revenue Agency, treatment of life insurance premiums as a capital outlay (non-deductibility; Line 8690 – Insurance), and the limited collateral-insurance deduction.
  2. Income Tax Act, subsection 89(1) (capital dividend account; death benefit net of adjusted cost basis credited to the CDA).
  3. Insurer advanced-markets material on key-person needs analysis (replacement cost, revenue contribution, debt exposure, and business-value impairment methods).
Important information

This material is provided for general educational purposes and is not individualized legal, tax, accounting, investment or insurance advice. The examples and strategies discussed may not be appropriate in every circumstance. Tax and legal outcomes depend on individual facts, ownership, policy terms and legislation in effect at the relevant time, and may change. Insurance recommendations should be based on an individual needs analysis and consideration of available alternatives, product terms, costs, guarantees and risks. Where tax, accounting or legal matters are involved, Sheldrake Group works alongside the client’s qualified professional advisers.

Written by Zachary Sikorski, CHS · EPC

Principal, Sheldrake Group. Zachary has worked in Canadian financial services since 2008, most recently as a District Vice President at Sun Life, working alongside independent advisory practices across Ontario and British Columbia. Sheldrake Group is built on the judgment that vantage point produced.

Published August 2026 · Last reviewed August 2026
By introduction

Most of our work begins with a conversation.

Begin a conversation